Introduction
Choosing the Right Heat Pump for Your Home
With rising energy costs and growing environmental concerns, heat pumps have become a popular choice for efficient heating and cooling in homes across the US. These systems are a great alternative to traditional furnaces or air conditioners. However, choosing between an air-source heat pump (ASHP) and a geothermal* ground-source heat pump (GSHP) can be daunting. Each type has unique benefits, costs, and requirements, making the decision dependent on factors like budget, space, and climate. This guide compares ASHPs and GSHPs, exploring their costs, efficiency, installation needs, and suitability to help you determine which is best for your home as of 2025.
Key Points
- Air source heat pumps (ASHPs) are generally more cost-effective and easier to install, while ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) offer higher efficiency, especially in colder climates.
- ASHPs are generally better for urban and suburban areas due to lower installation costs and space requirements, but in cold climates, GSHPs may save more long-term.
- There are two types of ASHPs: One, Mini-split (aka ductless) and; Two, Central air (aka ducted).
Space and Installation
- ASHPs require less space and are easier to install, making them suitable for urban or smaller properties. The outdoor portion generally requires the same space as a modern central air conditioner.
- GSHPs need significant land (600-1,200 square meters) for ground loops or boreholes, which can be disruptive and costly to install.
![]() |
Year by year cost reductions |
Cost Comparison
ASHPs typically cost between $3,500 and $20,000, depending on whether it’s a ductless mini-split system ($3,500-$6,000 per indoor head) or a central ducted system ($12,000-$20,000). GSHPs generally range from $10,000 to $50,000 or more, with higher costs for larger structures or those requiring boreholes. Historical trends show costs have decreased significantly since 2000, when ASHPs were around $19,000 and GSHPs exceeded $50,000.
Tax Credits
Federal tax credits currently offer up to $2,000 for ASHPs and 30% of cost (with no cap) for GSHPs. These incentives were scheduled to be available through 2032. However, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed July 4, 2025, impacted heat pump incentives by ending the $2,000 tax credit for ASHPs and 30% uncapped credit for GSHPs after December 31, 2025.
The Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates (HEAR) program, part of the Inflation Reduction Act, provides rebates for low- and moderate-income households for energy-efficient electric appliances and systems. This includes heat pumps, heat pump water heaters, electric stoves, ovens, dryers, and related electrical and home improvements. The program aims to make these upgrades more affordable, with potential rebates up to $14,000 per household. OBBBA also terminates the Home Electrification Rebate at the end of 2025.
![]() |
Year by year performance improvements |
Efficiency Comparison
As you can see in the graph above, heat pumps (which were already efficient) have continued to improve with each new generation of products. A standard air-sourced system in 2025 is more efficient than a typical ground-sourced system from 2 decades ago. This has made air-sourced systems practical in many more regions.
Efficiency is measured by the coefficient of performance (COP). ASHPs have a COP of 3-4, while GSHPs reach 4-6. Since 2000, efficiencies have improved from COP 2-3 to 3-4 for ASHPs and 3-4 to 4-6 for GSHPs, driven by advancements in compressors, motor controllers, and heat exchangers.
Installation and Space Requirements
ASHPs are easier to install, requiring only an outdoor unit and minimal space, ideal for urban areas. GSHPs need significant land for ground loops or boreholes, making them suitable for larger properties but more disruptive to install.
Performance in Different Climates
ASHPs perform well in moderate climates but may lose efficiency below 32°F. There are cold-climate models of ASHPs designed to operate as low as 15°F, but they are generally more expensive. GSHPs provide consistent performance due to stable ground temperatures below the frostline (50-60°F), ideal for harsh winters. Hybrid heat pump systems combine a heat pump with a gas furnace or other backup heat source, switching between them based on outdoor conditions to optimize efficiency and comfort. They are ideal for regions with extreme temperature swings, offering up to 30% energy savings. This setup suits homes with existing furnaces, providing a cost-effective transition to greener heating while maintaining reliability during severe cold snaps.
Maintenance, Lifespan, and Noise
ASHPs require moderate maintenance and last 15-20 years. GSHPs have lower maintenance needs, with indoor components lasting 25+ years and ground loops 50+ years. ASHPs can be noisier due to outdoor units, while GSHPs are quieter. With variable speed motors, new models of ASHPs are quieter than their predecessors.
Pros and Cons
- ASHP Pros: Lower cost ($3,500-$20,000), easier installation, less space needed, suitable for urban areas.
- ASHP Cons: Lower efficiency below 32°F, higher operating costs, noisier outdoor unit. (Hybrid systems that use a furnace only on subfreezing can mitigate this)
- GSHP Pros: Higher efficiency (COP 6), lower operating costs, longer lifespan, quieter operation.
- GSHP Cons: Higher upfront cost ($10,000-$50,000+), significant land needed, complex installation.
Mini-Split or Central Air?
Hybrid Heat Pump System
Technological Improvements (2000-2025)
Since Y2K, heat pump efficiencies have improved due to variable-speed compressors, enhanced heat exchangers, and smart controls. Cold-climate ASHPs and better GSHP ground loop designs emerged by 2010. By 2025, integration with solar panels and advanced controls further boosted performance.
Summary Table
Aspect | Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) | Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) |
---|---|---|
Cost (2025) | $3,500-$20,000 | $10,000-$50,000 |
Efficiency | COP: 3-4 | COP: 4-6 |
Installation | Easier, less disruptive | Complex, requires groundwork |
Space Needed | Less, wall-mounted | Significant, needs land |
Performance in Cold | Decreases below 32°F | Consistent |
Lifespan | 15-20 years | 25+ years (indoor), 50+ (loops) |
Federal Incentive | Up to $2,000 | 30% of cost (no cap) |
Which is Best for You?
The best choice depends on your budget, available space, and climate:
- If you prioritize long-term savings and have ample land, a GSHP might be more beneficial due to higher efficiency and lower operating costs.
- If you have limited space and a tighter budget, an ASHP is likely better due to lower upfront costs and easier installation.
- If you already have a home with ducting, a central ASHP can tap into these conditioned air highways.
- If you don't have existing ducting, ductless mini-split ASHP can give you the cool or warm air directly into the space you need it. Multiple heads may be needed for larger areas, but this allows for zone control, meaning you don't have to condition the spaces you are not using.
Consider your budget, space, climate, and incentives when deciding.
Citations:
- Energy Saving Trust: Air source heat pumps vs ground source heat pumps
- EnergySage: Air Source vs. Geothermal Heat Pumps
- The EcoExperts: Air Source vs Ground Source Heat Pumps
- GreenMatch: Air vs Ground Source Heat Pumps
- US Department of Energy: Heat Pump Systems
- Better Planet: Ground Source vs Air Source Heat Pumps
- EDF Energy: Ground source vs air source heat pumps
* Geothermal & Ground-source Terms
- Geothermal Heat Pump: A broad term that refers to any system using the Earth's thermal energy for heating or cooling. This includes GSHPs but can also encompass systems tapping into deeper geothermal resources (e.g., hot springs or volcanic heat) for direct heating or power generation. In residential contexts, it typically means a GSHP.
- Ground-Source Heat Pump: Specifically refers to a heat pump system that uses the stable temperature of the ground (or groundwater) at shallow depths below the frostline to transfer heat to or from a building. It involves ground loops (or sometimes wells, lakes, or ponds) to exchange heat with the soil or water.
No comments:
Post a Comment